- Joined
- May 18, 2022
- Threads
- 16
- Messages
- 97
- Reaction score
- 121
- Location
- Opelika, AL
- Website
- www.dinancars.com
- Car(s)
- GR Supra 2.0, 2x GR Supra 3.0's and countless BMWs
- Thread starter
- #46
1. We did do testing with the piggyback with full bolts ons but the difference between it and with stock components is minimal. The issue is the inputs a piggyback control are limited. Really need a true ECU flash to fully take advantage of those components via nuance within many more tables. With the bolt ons you will see some efficiency benefits (working less to achieve the same power with the intake/inlet and heat exchanger) but dyno numbers, specifically peak numbers, are effectively identical with the piggyback. See some minor benefit down low due to increased flow/spool given more air and minor gain at the top with the exhaust and reducing some backpressure but its so minor (~3-5 HP/TRQ differences) we generally don't bother even mentioning it as it can easily be seen as simply dyno run to run variance.@Dinan_Engineering my Dinan cat back, intake and inlet pipe will arrive this week, and I hadn’t planned on doing a piggyback or tune until I decide where the weak parts of the car are (6 months of ownership so far, 2024 MT).
I also got the CanCheck MFD so I can see as well as hear what the car is doing before I make any choices about performance uogrades
https://www.canchecked.de/display-fuer-toyota-supra-mk5-a90-a91/
I just learned about your piggyback, and might add it while I have the intake apart.
Two questions:
1. Did you do any in house map testing with your full bolt ons?
(I assume negligible difference from stock if so, but curious if you optimized anything as a complete package)
2. Do you have plans to add maps in the future, based especially on the recent release of the Final Edition Supra which shows very different hp/torque numbers?
2. No current plans for an additional version or map on the piggyback for the Final Edition. It likely is just how BMW does there levels of tuning between their versions (Comp, CS, CSL, GTS as an example) where the hardware is identical (although the GTS can get some more relevant changes) but they just turn up the wick a bit on software with each successive version further reducing the available overhead. In the piggyback world where you are playing within acceptable tolerances, the overhead regardless of version is the same, so it comes down to smaller deltas but the same ending point regardless. That said, we continue to work on our own method for defeating the newest Bosch encryption so if anything were to be released it would be more likely it would be that where we can elicit more power and have more control of various tables. In that case we would be able to take advantage of the various hard parts more effectively for increased benefit.
Sponsored