Cost vs performance for the 86 was more or less where it should be for the market. Did I want more power, yeah, but I also would have paid more for it too..So what is a correct Cost Vs Performance?
Are we talking like toyota 86? Or was that a bit skewed as well?
it really can't, unless there is no business sense involved... and as much as Toyota has done ridiculous things in the past, this one is a stretch even then.What I'm confused about is if Toyota and BMW have already come to an agreement about what's expected of their cars and not to cannibalize one another, where does the line end? The prototype Z4 is 50 grand or so with 382 HP. How can this cost ten thousand dollars more and offer less in that regards?
This is my main beef with the details as well, as it implies that the motor is the same as the Z4. Now, of course, we haven't fully confirmed that the Z4 uses the B58, but several journalists did say it was.part of part of my issue with this, aside from other parts, is the output and how its using B58 numbers as said. the new engine in the Supra uses an iron block and a new head and apparently has been tested to reliably hold 700hp. This was the design requirement Toyota issued to BMW; ensure the motor can handle extreme tuning (well, extreme in their eyes).
that said, why would the output of the new motor be the same as the B58? I think you would really have to try to get the figures to match considering nothing is common between them... granted, 350hp is what I was told the new motor makes atm.
Yet another piece to this puzzle is a US source tied to a VP said they requested the car make more power, to which (presumably) Tomoyama-san replied that he would speak to Tada in regards to.
I have more questions by the minute, but I'm trying my best to get answers without being super obvious. I did show this thread to a Japanese senior engineer on the Lexus side and he said cost vs performance did not look correct at all.
Toyota is more or less on press lockdown regarding the Supra right now, as they should be while finalizing a launch. I haven't been able to get any details from anyone, so I'm in the dark as well. As far as I know, they are aware of this thread though, so we'll see what happens. I haven't gotten an ominous call from Plano yet though...Let us know how Toyota is handling the news.
You and A70 are the reasons I keep coming back on the chance I learn something new about the car that I can't afford now but will down the roadThis is my main beef with the details as well, as it implies that the motor is the same as the Z4. Now, of course, we haven't fully confirmed that the Z4 uses the B58, but several journalists did say it was.
Toyota is more or less on press lockdown regarding the Supra right now, as they should be while finalizing a launch. I haven't been able to get any details from anyone, so I'm in the dark as well. As far as I know, they are aware of this thread though, so we'll see what happens. I haven't gotten an ominous call from Plano yet though...
That being said, if we just ignore the performance stuff, the interior seems pretty nice haha. Bespoke design, seperate from the Z4, high quality materials, and very sporty, so that's great news. BMW steering wheel and some shared switchgear is a bit lame, but expected. I'm not sure how I feel about iDrive yet, but I guess that's not a huge deal. Heads up display is awesome too.
Is this a definite thing, or could it be a lost in translation thing in regards to the B58 being closed deck vs the N55s open deck design?part of part of my issue with this, aside from other parts, is the output and how its using B58 numbers as said. the new engine in the Supra uses an iron block and a new head and apparently has been tested to reliably hold 700hp. This was the design requirement Toyota issued to BMW; ensure the motor can handle extreme tuning (well, extreme in their eyes).
that said, why would the output of the new motor be the same as the B58? I think you would really have to try to get the figures to match considering nothing is common between them... granted, 350hp is what I was told the new motor makes atm.
Yet another piece to this puzzle is a US source tied to a VP said they requested the car make more power, to which (presumably) Tomoyama-san replied that he would speak to Tada in regards to.
I have more questions by the minute, but I'm trying my best to get answers without being super obvious. I did show this thread to a Japanese senior engineer on the Lexus side and he said cost vs performance did not look correct at all.
The engine was 382 at 65k? I though it was 382 at 50k?I will re-quote this;
2019 BMW Z4 M40i SPECS
PRICE $65,000 (est)
LAYOUT Front-engine, RWD, 2-pass, 2-door convertible
ENGINE 3.0L/382-hp/369-lb-ft turbo DOHC 24-valve I-6
Z4 price is quoted by most of the journalists as "mid to high 60s" in the US.The engine was 382 at 65k? I though it was 382 at 50k?
Oh jesus christ this is getting worse by the minuteZ4 price is quoted by most of the journalists as "mid to high 60s" in the US.
http://www.motortrend.com/news/2019-bmw-z4-m40i-prototype-review/Oh jesus christ this is getting worse by the minute
Suffice to say that when properly equipped (and driven), the forthcoming 2019 Z4 M40i will be a worthy adversary to the Audi TT RS, Porsche 718 Boxster S, and Mercedes-AMG SLC 43 with a similar mid- to upper $60K price tag. Did you see that coming?
It is absolute, but I cannot give specific details on the motor beyond that.Is this a definite thing, or could it be a lost in translation thing in regards to the B58 being closed deck vs the N55s open deck design?