It's a smart move to me as it helps keep the base cost down, but I get wishing it was an option for those that really want the Sport model with a factory LSD. Think about how many people buy sports cars and don't have a clue what a LSD is. They never drive their car near the limit and probably never even turn the nannies off.Yeah LSD should have been standard or at least an option at the very least. However, the argument of no car is 100% prefect can be made and many would probably say it would still be better getting a base Z and then installing an aftermarket LSD vs the 2.0 Supra.
Think about how many people buy sports cars and don't have a clue what a LSD is. They never drive their car near the limit and probably never even turn the nannies off.
Oh man why didn't I think of that when I made my original post.I'm talking about the price differences back in the day. And also think about the dollar and inflation. You need to take many things into account.
Not sure how accurate the figures that I'm looking at are, but for the US I'd say the 370Z sold well the first 7 or so model years. Most models have a successor by then so the drop off should be expected since it was basically the same car produced for 13 model years. Refreshing bumpers, wheels and other minor updates only gets you so far. 13 model years is pretty unheard of outside of the GT-R, some pickups, and maybe a few other exceptions. I think I'll survive without a 2035 Nissan Z FM Platform 35th Anniversary 65th Anniversary Edition model.No doubt the Z has a huge fan base. They're going to sell good in the first few years. The real question is will Nissan give it proper updates to keep sale numbers from tanking as seen with the 370Z.
You make good points. I thought the ZX was quite a lot cheaper than the Supra (like 4-5 grand back in the day).Oh man why didn't I think of that when I made my original post.
1993 MSRP
Supra turbo: $39,900
300ZX turbo: $37,655
Differences: $2,245
Inflation: $4,466.64
2023 Z Performance auto: 47,000 (est.)
2022 Supra 3.0 base: $51,640
Differences: $4,640
Anyways, let's stop splitting hair for a second. Let's go back when you said the Z is going to be a "hard sell". Sorry, but I disagree. The Z car has a pretty big following. Like a bunch of people have already said, it's like the Japanese Mustang.
It's like they are trying to make sure that the stamping of the body panels can be done as quickly and cheaply as possible, even a Corolla hatchback has more curves on its sides.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So I saw it yesterday and my thoughts on the whole car is just that I find it to be a very simple design.
Rear end - this was my favorite part outside yet I forgot to take a pic of it. The rear was interesting because of the lights that give off a 300zx vibe and the smooth black diffuser in gloss black. It kinda looks boxy in shape however which is similar to a 240z 8/10
Side profile - this is where I became a bit disappointed vs pics. It looks kind of flat and simple instead of having that typical sports car muscular curves. I did like the black top in person as I did in pics. 7/10
Front - I'm still not a fan of this area in the flesh. It's my least favorite part of the car. 3/10
Interior - it looked like a really nice improvement over the 370z but keep in mind this is the Performance Premium model. 9/10
This car has what I consider a somewhat safe/inoffensive and boring design of the sports car spectrum. If you're into that and you hate sleek creases and curves with either real or fake vents this car will more than suffice.
Just a cost-containment exercise to capitalize on the name for a few $$. Glad we have new sportscars but its a symptom of a box filled/truck trash- Suv world we live. Fk all that.It's like they are trying to make sure that the stamping of the body panels can be done as quickly and cheaply as possible, even a Corolla hatchback has more curves on its sides.
Speaking of those CUVs, SUVs and pick-up trucks, I really don't get why so many people keep getting more and more obsessed with tall riding vehicles, if they need a vehicle that can go off-roading and hauling heavy loads then I totally understand buying a BOF SUV or a pick-up truck, but most people just buy and use them for the typical daily commute on the street, and later then they start complaining about fuel and tire costs, also lets not talk about how pointless crossovers/CUVs generally are.Just a cost-containment exercise to capitalize on the name for a few $$. Glad we have new sportscars but its a symptom of a box filled/truck trash- Suv world we live. Fk all that.
I would not buy the Z. I like the Supra better and its a much more intriguing design visually vs the Z. We are lucky to have both given what most people buy to drive overall.
IMO it is hard to score the interior until folks have actually owned and lived with the car. I owned a 370Z for about 7 years and it rattled, squeaked and overall didn't feel super well put together. I worry because the new interior looks almost exactly the same, with new electronics but basically the same junky trim.Interior - it looked like a really nice improvement over the 370z but keep in mind this is the Performance Premium model. 9/10