FLtrackdays
Well-Known Member
I haven’t really weighed in here yet, deciding to just watch from the sidelines with some popcorn instead, so I guess here it goes.
I’m almost 40 and the Supra is the first AT vehicle I’ve ever owned, everything else going back to when I was 15 has been MT. For decades I have been adamantly against ATs, every single one I’ve ever driven (family cars, friends’ cars, rentals) has been terrible. I had an Impala rental last year on vacation and the trans in that was fucking awful. I need to feel in control of the cars I own/drive, and until the Supra I thought that meant they had to be MT.
Well it turns out that what I need to feel “in control” comes from exactly two things:
1) Being in complete control over what gear the car is in at any time
2) No “slush” in the drivetrain - like when you hit the gas in an AT car and the engine revs up before it actually starts accelerating
Well for #1 you really just need a manual mode that works like you’d expect, not necessarily a full MT. And for #2 you either need a clutch or a locking torque converter, which the ZF8 has.
It turns out that, at least for me, fucking around with the clutch and gear lever have absolutely no impact on my feeling of being in control of or connected to the car. None.
The second aspect to MT vs AT is boredom/having something to do. With a slow car even the best AT is just boring when driving fast, you just floor it and…that’s it. Well once you get above about 4-500 hp with a rwd car that’s not the case anymore. There is plenty for you to do to keep things in line without having to muck about with a clutch/gear lever.
If the Supra was available in MT back when I got mine, I absolutely would have gone that route without a second thought, and I’d probably be on the other side of this conversation adamantly arguing that an MT is more enjoyable and you feel more in control. After having the AT for 2 years, if my car was suddenly totaled and I had to do it all over again, I’d almost certainly go with the AT again because now I know that argument is BS.
And my other, slow winter/grocery car, will probably stay MT for the foreseeable future because slow cars really need an MT so you have something to do.
That’s itLike you: before owning my supra, I would have been anti AT blah blah. I've never, ever owned a performance car that wasn't MT. I kept reading how the GT500 and Camaro are super fast with the 10spd autos, or whatever. I rolled my eyes. "F automatics" has always been my motto because, as we've all reiterated a million times in this thread alone (but some just can't seem to fathom), ATs used to S U C K. They don't any more.
I don't expect anyone to understand, as I didn't either. I'm not a hypocrite. I was just as closed-minded towards anything not MT, so I kinda expect any REAL enthusiast, who hasn't tried one out, to be the same.
But hey: If you drive both cars, without ever shifting, they both perform the same.
And thatEveryone just needs to relax. I don't drive around thinking I'm better than the automatic Supra drivers. It's all personal preference. I'll tell you what though, those smiles per gallon are priceless shifting my own gears even if the manual technically is marginally slower than the automatic. As I'm sure the automatic guys are sitting there glad they don't have to be stuck in rush hour traffic shifting gears.
If this was a MX5 forum, I’d have to say the manual all the way. But for the Supra, with either transmission, she‘s a steal for real car enthusiast.
*(I think there are two active threads on this same subject . This may even beat which oil to use someday for most repetitive threads, lol)*
Sponsored
Last edited: